Tuesday, September 16, 2008

God’s War

In this news clip from CNN showing Sarah Palin’s interview with Charlie Gibson sheds an interesting light on how the media can make us question the beliefs of the candidates at hand. In the interview, ABC shows clips of a speech Palin gave at her church in which she makes reference to the war in Iraq being ‘God’s War’ and that what is happening is ‘God’s Plan’. This makes her look a bit like she is playing the role of God or delivering God’s words, a bit religiously extreme. However, CNN goes on to expose ABC in that they only showed clips of her speech at the church and those clips had been taken out of context. Palin was not speaking on behalf of God, but instead asking her fellow parishioners to pray that the war was ‘a task from God’ and that there is a ‘plan that is God’s plan’.
Palin’s words were taken out of context and used to make her appear in a certain light while running a political campaign. The CNN piece then goes on to compare her references to God to some well respected politicians of our past and how they were well received but now we do not view religion in the same light. Kennedy used God in his speeches, which was well received, but today we have gone against religion playing a role in politics at all. President Bush is often criticized for using references to faith and God in his speeches, which I believe is sad. None of the politicians using religion are trying to force their specific religious beliefs on us, they are simply sharing them with us. As politicians are they not also free to exercise their right to religion? Our country is weary toward politicians expressing any form of faith or religion, but what happened to freedom of religion? Instead it has become freedom from religion. We do not want our government officials having the freedom to express their religion in a public setting, we as the people want freedom from their religion.
My last thought on this is whether or not religion can be completely left out of a campaign. If Palin were not to bring up her religious life or beliefs, the media still would. Even if her religion were something that she kept in her private life and kept out of her political life, it would inevitably be drug out into her politics. The media has tried and tried again to get McCain to bring up religion, but that is something that he wishes to keep more private, and yet they keep prying. If religion is not something we want in our political relm, why does the media keep dragging it out? Yes, of course to sell papers and get ratings, but it is truly sad that it is often done at the expense of the truth and real context of a political candidates real religious beliefs and affiliations.

***** URL for video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Us3sI95L6O0

3 comments:

head book man said...

I very much agree with your opinions, Megan. The media becomes a hypocrite itself when it pries and pries for religion. The comments that Sarah Palin made in her church were in the private realm of her life, not in the political spectrum. Who’s to say that she’ll then bring those opinions to the forefront of her campaign? I can say from experience that what I say behind doors about my beliefs can differ slightly when discussing politics or the betterment of our country. I agree completely when you say that even though we claim we don’t care about religion or we don’t want it in our politics, we dig for it incessantly. We bring up every little religious detail we can find and scrutinize with no mercy whatsoever. I don’t think this will ever necessarily change, but I think we need to question how far we dig just to spotlight a politician we don’t like.

Tim D said...

I agree with your last sentence. It is the medias job to sell papers and get ratings, even if they use questionably tactics. I have not heard Palin’s speech to her church, however, whether it was taken out of context or not, she still should have been careful what she said (which is unfortunate). I do think that it is important to know were a particular political candidate stands, because that is important to a lot of voters. I do not think that the candidates should force their religious beliefs on us either, and like you said, I do not think that they are.

Claire Shea said...

I recently engaged in a debate about the topic of war and it's place within Catholic thought, specifically within thought behind Catholic voting, and found myself conflicted over these very comments made by Palin. On one hand, I find them near blasphemous in their assumed role of Palin as God and the manipulative word change of 'Bush's Plan' to 'God's Plan'. However, the opponent in the debate brought up a starling point in regards to the Catholic soldiers Palin was addressing in this speech. In order for a Catholic to allow the concept of war to occur, they must believe they are fighting a threatening evil or defending a loving good. Therefore, are not all soldiers, Catholic in specific, fighting because of an evil they believe lies in the Middle East? Logistically speaking, they are fighting a war they deem morally and spiritually necessary by God. 'God's Plan' is merely what is being played out in the cities and streets of Iraq. Maybe Palin wasn't so far off in her references to 'God's War' and 'God's Plan'.

Of course this falls under the assumption that all American soldiers defending our country hold a virtuous and morally good intent. Whether or not that is the case is up for contention.