Saturday, February 14, 2009

Cultural Wars of the Religious Right

In his article, The Culture Wars Are Still Not Over, Frederick Clarkson recalls claims by the political punditry in the wake of the 2000 Presidential election that the religious right was effectively dead and asserts that those who claim that the religious right is dead now are just as wrong as they were 8 years ago. He cites a 1992 speech made by Pat Buchanan at the Republican National Convention in which Buchanan declares that the United States was in the midst of a “cultural war” that will determine what we stand for as Americans. Clarkson, however, disagrees, saying that the religious right is not driving a cultural war, but indeed a religious one that manifests itself on cultural fronts, “most urgently abortion, homosexuality (especially, now, marriage equality), education privatization, and curriculum content of the public schools”.
Though some historians, such as Thomas Frank in his book What’s the Matter with Kansas, argue that the religious right has been largely unsuccessful in passing the agenda it promises, it also true that the religious right successfully passed Proposition 8 in California, rolling back civil rights legislation for homosexuals in that state. Or as Clarkson emotionally declares, the religious right effectively squashed the “court ordered advance in civil rights gained by an oppressed minority”. As such, Clarkson argues that the ‘cultural war’ the religious right claims to lead is actually a one-sided war of aggression on the civil rights of others and an effort to ‘save’ people who don’t want or need saving by slipping religious education into public schools, reinstituting what they insist is “God’s country”.
But in addition to their war-like rhetoric and moral certitude , what is particularly alarming to those who oppose the agenda of the religious right is their broadening coalition and ability to transcend their many political losses. As William Martin describes in his book With God On Our Side, the evangelical religious right, once a splintered cluster of un-unified religious groups, coalesced in the seventies around their mutual frustration of the Federal government’s so-called intrusions into their lives. Just as Protestants unified and entered politics due to a mutual sense of oppression by the national government, so now are many denominations of Christianity unifying to pass a religiously oriented political agenda. Proposition 8 did not pass in California solely as a result of evangelical efforts but indeed a broad coalition of Protestants, Roman Catholics, and Mormons worked together to pass the initiative. As such, as the religious right broadens it’s coalition, it is counter-intuitive to believe that the religious right will die anytime soon: as it withstood its many political losses, it is not likely to die out after such a momentous victory as the passing of Proposition 8.

4 comments:

Limor B said...

I would agree with Clarkson and Natalie that the religious right is leading the “one sided” war to save everyone in America who are not following the same religious doctrine as them. The religious right has continuously claimed to be fighting for “justice for all” but defines justice as returning to traditional family values. I disagree with Natalie’s observation that the religious right has become stronger over the years. Her use of proposition 8 is not evidence that the religious right is getting strong nationally because proposition 8 was a state law. Furthermore, the recent presidential election demonstrates how weak the religious right has become in national politics. Many traditionally conservative voters voted for Barack Obama because they felt that the Republican Party did not represent their needs anymore. These conservative voters are key to the political potency of the religious right.

Anonymous said...

I agree with the idea of a "one-sided" war, however, I feel there is a better description of what the Christian Right is trying to do. The Christian Right is pushing for change, while the Left wants to keep the status quo. In this respect, the fight is one-sided. Of course the Religious Right is going to be fighting with more force: they are actually looking to change laws. This battle cannot be just a one-sided war, though, if the Christian Right is being defeated. The Left has to be pushing back a little. This argument of whether or not the Christian Right is dead has been brought up several times throughout this class, and I think it is obvious that the movement is still persisting. Laws are still being changed in favor of the Christian Right, and they do not seem to have backed down from too many of their arguments.

Amit R. said...

I agree with both Natalie’s and Clarkson’s belief that the Religious Right is not “dead” and that it has, in fact, showed its political strength by greatly impacting the passage of Proposition 8 in California. At the same time, though, this is an extremely dangerous time for the Religious Right. As Limor commented, the 2008 presidential election saw an increasing number of typically conservative Evangelical Christians vote for Democratic nominee Barack Obama. This may signal a growing trend of Evangelicals supporting Republican policies on religiously-charged issues such as abortion and same-sex marriage, but disagreeing with the GOP on other issues such as the economy and foreign policy. Do not be surprised therefore, to see growing support for a Religious Left, which would continue to push for conservative social change, but have more liberal beliefs while dealing with other political issues.

Amit R. said...
This comment has been removed by the author.