Wednesday, March 25, 2009

School of Jihad?

Picture this. A religious school in a small, suburban community is looking to expand. The neighbors are concerned, though, worried that a bigger school will mean more traffic, more crowding, and more pollution.

Nothing out of the ordinary there—seems like a matter for the county commissioners. And if this were a Christian school, something like, say, Our Lady of Perpetual Something-or-Other, the issue would probably stop there. But this case isn’t so simple. The religious school in question is Fairfax City’s Islamic Saudi Academy.

The Washington Post reports:

At a public hearing last week, mundane neighborhood concerns were overshadowed by a longstanding dispute over the school's teachings and the perception that it promotes intolerance of other cultures…In 2007, a congressionally appointed panel found that some of the school's textbooks included language intolerant of other religions as well as passages that could be construed as advocating violence.


What was once a local issue has gone nationwide, as everyone from Congress on down is getting involved. One congressman went so far as to write to Secretary of State Clinton, complaining that the school’s textbooks “still contain questionable material.” The neighbors, naturally, are a little irked. They wanted to talk about school parking; instead, they’ve got to deal with people like this:

"The Islamic Saudi Academy's purpose is to train young and innocent Muslim children to hate and wage war into the future against our children," James Lafferty, a spokesman for the Traditional Values Coalition, a church lobbying group, said during the hearing.

Now that’s what I call hyperbole!

Religious schools will always be a contentious issue, whether they are Catholic, Protestant, Islamic, or what have you. Critics, whether of specific religions like Islam or simply of religion in general, like to throw around words like “indoctrination” and “brainwashing.” Kids are impressionable, they say, and shouldn’t be subjected to a diet of religious orthodoxy.

Things get especially tricky where Islam is concerned. Over the past couple years, Americans have heard a lot about madrasahs, traditional Islamic schools. The media portrays them as terrorist factories churning out one jihadnik after another. No surprise, then, that some people are leery about the Saudi Academy.

In my opinion, though, these sort of fears are grossly overinflated. The Saudi Academy isn’t a terrorist training camp. It’s not a threat to national security. It’s not going to release a wave of suicide bombers into suburban Virginia. And if some of the textbooks are inflammatory? Well, that’s the concern of the school administration, not of Congress.

We’ve heard these arguments before. Less than a century ago, people suspected that Catholic schools were nothing more than fronts for the Vatican. Little Catholic kids were being raised to pledge allegiance to the Pope, rather than the flag. A lot of people tried to shut these schools down by claiming they were a threat to the country. These people weren’t necessarily anti-Catholic bigots, but their actions were bigoted nonetheless.

Not much has changed since then, it seems. I recommend that everyone involved take a deep breath. Congress, take a few steps back. Let the locals sort this one out.

3 comments:

Chrisy Y. said...

Great post!
I liked the comparison you made between the Saudi Academy and Catholic schools in the past. It's definitely true. I think this became a bigger issue after someone discovered the textbook language. Perhaps the school could look into revising their textbook so the language wouldn't be so intolerant of others. I'm a little wary of the argument against the school because in our country today, it's really hard to tell the difference between true concerns and plain old xenophobia. Let's face it, Americans haven't been able to look at individuals from the Middle East in the same way since September 11th. Children are impressionable but we can't forget that they're still children and probably not life-threatening. We have young gang members in public schools today who probably pose more of a threat to our safety than these young Muslims do.

Iftikhar Ahmad said...

The western "values" suggest equality and freedom for all, that means society must allow religious freedom. The Christians and Jews have Church/ Jewish schools as well as kosher meat, yet when Muslims simply ask for the very same treatment,the Islamphobic secular right wing jump up and down screaming that somehow western values have been attacked.

The Jews throughout the western world have their own religious courts. Christians have been enjoying the right to be married in Church. Muslims should have the same right to get married in Masajid as well as they need Sharia Courts, dealing in marriage, civil matters and divorce.

It is easy to say" Go back to where you came from",but do not forget that British Muslims are actually born and educated here. They are in the unenviable position of trying to combine two diffent worlds. That is no easy.

Multiculturalism is not about separation, ghettoisation or balkanisation. It is, instead, a recognition of both diversity and the need for common ground, mutual respect,and cultural engagement.

Muslims all over the world never opposed English as a language what they did was opposition of the Western culture and their system of education. In Pakistan, the medium of instruction is Urdu and English and the official language is both English and Urdu. Pakistan is going to send English teachers to Korea for the teaching of English language.

Muslim parents would like their children to be well versed in standard English to follow the National Curriculum and go for higher studies and research to serve humanity.

Majority of Muslim children leave schools with low grades because state schools with monolingual teachers are not capable of teaching English to bilingual children.At the same time, they need to learn and be well versed in Arabic, Urdu and other community languages to keep in touch with their cultural roots and enjoy the beauty of their literature and poetry.

I am concerned with the education of the Muslim children. It is nothing to do with integration or segregation. Those state as well as Church schools where Muslim children are in majority, in my opinion, may be designated as Muslim community schools with bilingual Muslim teachers as role models.

Bilingual Muslim children need state funded Muslim schools with bilingual Muslim teachers as role models during their developmental periods. There is no place for a non-Muslim child or a teacher in a Muslim school.
Iftikhar Ahmad
www.londonschoolofislamics.org.uk

concerned said...

Chrisy Y.,
I don't see Jihad coming from Catholic schools. That is a huge difference.

Iftikhar A,
Yikes! State sponsered Muslim schools where only Muslim children would be allowed to attend? Separate courts and laws? Such things do not exist for Christians or Jews in the U.S., and I certainly don't think it should happen for Muslims.