As he details “Why Obama Should Visit a Mosque,” New York Times Op-Ed columnist Roger Cohen notes that as of yet, the Democratic nominee for the 2008 election has failed to do so, despite many visits to churches and synagogues. In his article, Cohen finds the root cause for this fact in an anti-Muslim stigma that is not only ubiquitous but also shameful for its ignorant nature. Some may argue that American categorization of Muslims as backwards and radically violent is justified by tragedies such as 9/11. Ultimately, though, an entire religion, despite its many facets, has been put on trial in a manner that urges us “in numberless ways to equate Islam with terrorists plotting Armageddon” and thus bars the Senator from entering the Muslim sphere.
Consider the so-called whisper rumors that falsely cast Obama as a radical Muslim. For Cohen, the heinous aspect of that situation is not that these emails have been targeted at specific and crucial voting blocs, such as the undecided, elderly Jews of Florida, in order to discourage their loyalty to the Senator. Rather, the tragedy lies in the damning power of such accusations. The fact that such questions about Obama’s association with Islam are so catastrophic to his campaign proves that Americans are light-years from acknowledging the “wonders of hospitality and generosity and wisdom that seem to well from Islam.”
If “fear-mongering about Islam is a global industry” that “thrives on ignorance,” how can we overturn a religious prejudice so powerful it may ruin a political career? Only with a powerful instrument of change—one like Barack Obama, in whom Cohen sees the resources needed to break down, once and for all, the barriers that exist between Muslims and the rest of the country. He writes, “Obama has a unique power to break the cycle, not least by emboldening moderate Muslims to denounce terror. Nothing would do more in the long run security of the world.” Who better to show, once and for all, that Islam is not a violent religion than a man whose very presence within the election is a force against prejudice and disenfranchisement? Who better to acknowledge and accept Islam’s many diversities and virtues than a man with diverse roots and a power for words and diplomacy? Obama’s is the voice that will finally separate the multitudes of Muslim faithful from the rare, radical perpetrators of violence, freeing them speak out against terrorism and work as agents of peace themselves.
Cohen’s article captures the sentiment of inspiration, hope and change that permeate Obama’s campaign. Still, his vision for a new America and his expectations for the leader at its helm are lofty, lacking much substance or concrete means for implementation, a fault for which Obama has been criticized. Thus, Cohen sounds a bit like an impassioned, motivated politician attempting to pledge supporters to his cause. And perhaps this is all part of his aim to capture the interest of Obama supporters and then impress upon them the importance of the Muslim demographic. After all, if enough of those pledged to the Democratic candidate can realize the value of Islam as both a religion and a positive political force, Obama may have no choice but to finally open the door to a Mosque.
Friday, September 5, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
5 comments:
Rachel, I agree that it is a “lofty” responsibility for Cohen to speculate that Obama has the ability and resources to change the stigma associated with Islam around the world, let alone in America. As the saying goes, actions speak louder than words; therefore his attendance will start a train of events that will promote his platform of tolerance and diplomacy…while also attracting the skeptics in America. Change has to initiate somewhere and if he chooses to visit a mosque it will be beneficial to the Muslim demographic in America, as everyone longs to feel connected and represented by our political leaders. With that being said, it very well could be detrimental to his campaign however I have a hard time seeing how his attendance could be any worse off than the stigma already associated with him by his opposition.
I read somewhere that “No religious test or qualification shall ever be annexed to any oath of office under the authority of the U.S.” Yet, with the way the presidential campaigns are going I feel as though this is an absolutely false statement due to the fact the public are the ones that give the religious test. I think that you are right in saying that Obama has the chance to bring the Islam religion into a different light, but only if the public lets him. However, I don’t think the public is ready for such action. I think there’s an invisible line drawn somewhere to mark the spot of too much change, and unfortunately, in a scared nation at war, I believe that’s at his outward support of Islam.
Barack Obama has run for office on a campaign of change. However, when does change transition from refreshing to radical? It is a tricky line to walk and I think that his previous challenges with Islam and questions about his faith prove that he cannot afford to deepen his ties to Islam at this juncture in the campaign. It is sad that this is the case, not to mention arrogant and a little hypocritical, but nevertheless true in my opinion. I would hope that others share Cohen’s ideas on tolerance and acceptance of Islam, but am afraid that the vast majority of US citizens aren’t yet ready to embrace a religion that they still view as a direct threat to national security.
I have no doubt that the Muslim people are, for the most part, peaceful. However, I don’t think the American people are there yet. Even a few months ago when two Muslim women wanted to stand behind Obama during a speech, they were asked to move by Barack’s staff—the campaign didn’t want to be associated with Muslims. I don’t understand why it’s that big of a deal if he was even a Muslim, which he’s not, but this comes back to a deeply seeded issue of ignorance and intolerance. Sure, I would love to see Obama campaigning amongst Muslims, but I unfortunately see this as political suicide.
I think you make a good point about the "religious test" required for office in this country. It's not written in the law, but it is certainly true for voters. While Obama may not be able to come out and say "and what if I was a Muslim?" many other politicians and even voters themselves, should be asking this every time they hear the word being thrown around as a dirty insult. John McCain would impress me if he were to defend not just Obama against the false "charges" of being Muslim, but rather the Muslim community at large for their religion being used as a synonym for "terrorist."
Post a Comment