“It is not the state’s place to define marriage in a way that excludes a segmentIt looks like Paterson is leaving the decision of whether or not gay marriage is a sin to the churches and attempting to enforce equal legal rights to all people. When asked about the differing statements of the new archbishop of New York on the matter, Paterson said that all religious leaders are entitled to their opinions, but that New York is a civil government and therefore should seek to provide equal rights to everyone.
of the population from the legal benefits associated with marriage.”
In my opinion, Paterson’s statements are convincing in their ability to support the separation of church and state. Even if the church’s opinion of gay marriage is that it is sinful, every person should be entitled to equal rights under the law. By prohibiting gay couples to enjoy the same rights as heterosexual married couples, the basic premise of American democracy of “equality for all” is compromised. The way Paterson relates this fight for equal rights to other, previous civil rights’ action is also a good analogy that makes the listener realize how America has changed and the necessity of change. It would be difficult to argue that African-Americans or women do not deserve certain rights based on one element, and Paterson makes this analogy that homosexuals should not be denied their rights based solely on their sexuality. It looks as though there is a lot of support for this bill in New York and it will be interesting to follow its progress to see if it joins the other four states that allow same-sex marriages.
No comments:
Post a Comment